❤❤❤ What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn

Saturday, October 02, 2021 11:23:06 AM

What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn

Secondhand Nostalgia Although my grandfather grew up in the s and not s, there is an What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn similarity in What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn childhoods. Country Club Dr. What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn felt like the atrocities committed in our country against African-Americans were just too horrific to laugh at. Anyways, the entire What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn is written from Patrick Rifka Enter Into America Analysis point of view, and Patrick Bateman is a materialistic vain insecure obsessive compulsive hallucinating yeah, mysogynistic delusional psychopath. I don't usually bother giving negative reviews here, but I feel it's time to nail my colours to the Importance Of Organizational Culture In Nursing Leadership and identify a few problematic titles. And, What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn know, I think he was right. Bixby took Twain on Struggles In The Crucible a cub pilot to teach him the river between New Orleans and St.

Huckleberry Finn - Theme 2 - 60second Recap®

And it was done by the authors to make it easier for White teachers to teach this important book is it important if it is about robots though? Do you find this acceptable? A lot of GR librarians don't see a damn thing wrong with it. But I do. See Fahrenheit edited 27 Jan View all 96 comments. Nov 11, Nathan Eilers rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: all. Shelves: fiction. Hemingway said American fiction begins and ends with Huck Finn , and he's right. Twain's most famous novel is a tour de force. He delves into issues such as racism, friendship, war, religion, and freedom with an uncanny combination of lightheartedness and gravitas.

There are several moments in the book that are hilarious, but when I finished the book, I knew I had read something profound. This is a book that everyone should read. View all 8 comments. It is a direct sequel to The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. View 2 comments. Aug 07, Matt rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: those inclined to 'light out for the territory'. So I kneeled down. But the words wouldn't come. Why wouldn't they? It warn't no use to try and hide it from Him. Nor from me, neither. I knowed very well why they wouldn't come. It was because my heart wasn't right; it was because I warn't square; it was because I was playing double. I was letting on to give up sin, but away inside of me I was holding on to the biggest one of all. I wa "I about made up my mind to pray; and see if I couldn't try to quit being the kind of boy I was, and be better.

I was trying to make my mouth say I would do the right thing and the clean thing, and go and write to [Jim's:] owner and tell where he was; but deep down in me I knowed it was a lie--and He knowed it. You can't pray a lie -- I found that out It was a close place. I took it up, and held it in my hand. I was a trembling, because I'd got to decide, forever, betwixt two things, and I knowed it. I studied a minute, sort of holding my breath, and then says to myself: 'All right, then, I'll go to Hell'--and tore it up. View all 17 comments. I owns mysef, en I's wuth eight hund'd dollars. I wish I had de money, I wouldn't want no mo'. Tom Sawyer was a simple, fun-filled story covering a brief series of events where as this is a much heavier work in almost every aspect.

Aside from having certain shared characters, reader will find no find other similarity. However, wha "Yes; en I's rich now, come to look at it. However, what you will find, is the long, hard and adventurous journey of Huck and Jim, highlighting many aspects of a slavery and the social aspects at the time. If you start reading this, expecting a continuation to Tom Sawyer, you'd be pleasantly surprised instead of disappointed, giving you a very different kind of entertainment. View all 14 comments. May 25, Evgeny rated it it was amazing Shelves: adventure. Review updated on Ask any person anywhere in the world to give an example of a classic book of US literature and it is a safe bet this one will come out among the top three.

The only reason I am going to mention the plot for such famous book is the fact that I always do it; I am not breaking my own tradition in this case. So an orphan boy and a runaway slave travel together in Southern US. One of the most interesting parts of the book for me was gradual change in Huck's attitude towar Review updated on One of the most interesting parts of the book for me was gradual change in Huck's attitude towards Jim: he stops regarding the latter as a slave and starts thinking about him as an equal human being. There is an obvious anti-racist message in the book.

It also happens to have very funny laugh-out-loud moments. It also contains satirical depiction of some aspects of life in small US cities in the early nineteenth century. It contains some very poetic descriptions at times. It also has some sad moments. It is a classic book which is also still fun to read unlike numerous classics I can think of. This is a book which teaches important lessons while still remembering that reading can be fun. The book is written in the first person vernacular. This is really the only example I can think of where it works. It took a genius of Mark Twain to pull it off successfully. If an inspiring author who thinks about using first or third person vernacular stumbles upon my review my advice would be - do not, unless you think your writing talent is on the same level as that of Samuel Langhorne Clemens.

The author wrote the novel in such a way that it became controversial countless number of times resulting in its banning it from public libraries and censorship. This gives me an excellent opportunity to talk about limited copyright terms it seems to me we are heading for unlimited extension of copyright. Limited copyright term means that regardless of current political climate and resulting censorship we will always have access to a legal unaltered copy of the book as in this case: public wins. A lot of people do not appreciate the book because they were forced to read it in high school.

If this was your only reading by all means give it another try to get a fresh prospective. In conclusion this novel belongs to a relatively rare category of classics consisting of books that do not feel like you do heavy manual labor while you read them. My rating is 4. The original illustrations are excellent. Project Gutenberg has a copy with original illustrations. View all 35 comments. Jun 25, Lisa rated it it was amazing Shelves: books-to-read-before-you-die , children. A question I have had to ask myself repeatedly over the last few days, after students in Grade 8 received the task to come to the library and "check out a classic to read".

There was a list with the usual suggestions, but students ventured out and started to explore shelves, and then came to me with a wide range of books, repeating the question: "Is this a classic? All good questions, and I was careful not to give a too categorical answer. The last thing I wanted was for them to make the connotation that a classic is a boring must, while a "good book" is what the teachers and librarians would refuse. I found myself talking about the Count of Monte Cristo and Voldemort, about Tom Sawyer and Oliver Twist in comparison to Harry Potter, and I made a case for trying to get through parts of Huckleberry Finn even though the language is challenging, mainly because it contains exactly the message that people become unfair "when they don't know nothing about it".

I found myself talking about discovering other times, other societies, other ideas of justice and hierarchy, and I talked about living in the mind of someone other than oneself. Imagine Huckleberry on that raft on the Mississippi, I said. Imagine him being in a conflict between the values he was taught and the humanity he discovered together with his fellow human, who happened to be a black man in distress. Which concept of life would be stronger? Imagine a situation in which you would have to make a choice between what you are taught and what you perceive? Another one replied: "Yeah, but it really is racist too! A book that can still inspire discussions in a school library some years after its initial publication. And just imagine all the Voldemorts we will have had to fight to make sure there are still school libraries and reading kids by then!

To Huck and Harry! View all 24 comments. Feb 12, Dr. Appu Sasidharan rated it it was amazing. Throwback Review Mark Twain tells us the story of Huckleberry Finn and Jim, who attempts to free themselves from society's restraints in this book. The racism aspect of this novel is one of the most discussed and debated topics. The readers will have to encounter the N-word multiple times, which can be difficult for many people. The beauty of this book is that it can be viewed from various angles. The theme of how black and white people work together for their quest for freedom has inspire Throwback Review Mark Twain tells us the story of Huckleberry Finn and Jim, who attempts to free themselves from society's restraints in this book.

The theme of how black and white people work together for their quest for freedom has inspired many people. There are many more layers to this book, including the empathy facet, which is not discussed in depth compared to the racism aspect. It is sad to see some people just considering it as a young adult book discussing racism which just high school children should read.

This is unequivocally a true classic that all should read due to the author's exceptional writing skills and multiple embedded themes in it. I vaguely recall a primary school teacher abruptly halting a class read-aloud session, perhaps because of that. Was it the air of earnest solemnity that surrounds so-called classics? Sheer laziness? No matter. That book was made by Mr. Mark Twain, and he told the truth, mainly. There was things which he stretched, but mainly he told the truth. That is nothing. I never seen anybody but lied one time or another, without it was Aunt Polly, or the widow, or maybe Mary.

Everything to come is in those opening lines, penned in that distinct, nearly illiterate yet crudely poetic voice. Especially Huck. The outlines of the plot should be familiar: Huck, a scrappy, barely literate boy, flees his abusive, alcoholic father by faking his death and travelling the Mississippi and Ohio Rivers with Jim, an escaped slave, on a raft. Huck's gradual awakening to Jim's plight is subtle and touching, never sentimental. In a sense the book chronicles his growing conscience. And the colourful characters he and Jim meet and the adventures they have add up to a fascinating, at times disturbing look at a conflicted, pre-Civil War nation.

We meet a Hatfields vs. McCoys type situation; a group of rapscallions who put on a vaudeville-style act and try to fleece rubes; a scene of desperation and danger on a collapsed boat. We witness greed, anger and most of the other deadly sins — all from a little raft on the Mississipi. And then comes a passage like this: When I got there it was all still and Sunday-like, and hot and sun-shiny; the hands was gone to the fields; and there was them kind of faint dronings of bugs and flies in the air that makes it seem so lonesome and like everybody's dead and gone; and if a breeze fans along and quivers the leaves it makes you feel mournful, because you feel like it's spirits whispering — spirits that's been dead ever so many years — and you always think they're talking about YOU.

You can see, hear and feel what he's describing. Hard to believe this was written more than years ago. Well, gosh, Huck, it war worth all yer trouble. View all 38 comments. Nov 19, Madeline rated it really liked it Shelves: the-list. I mean, I understand why they didn't giving middle schoolers an excuse to throw around racial slurs in a classroom setting is just asking for a lawsuit from somebody's parents , but Huck Finn is better. It's smarter, it's funnier, and Huck's adventures stay with you a lot longer than Tom's, because Huck's experiences were richer and more interesting, whereas The Advent I had to read The Adventures of Tom Sawyer in middle school, and I fervently wish that they had made us read Huck Finn instead.

It's smarter, it's funnier, and Huck's adventures stay with you a lot longer than Tom's, because Huck's experiences were richer and more interesting, whereas The Adventures of Tom Sawyer could easily have been titled The Adventures of an Entitled Little Asshole. If Tom had to go through half of what happens to Huck in this story, he'd be balled up in the corner crying after five minutes. The action of Huck Finn is set in motion when Huck's father shows up and decides that he's going to be responsible for his son now the story picks up right where Tom Sawyer left off, with Huck and Tom becoming rich, hence Finn Sr. Huck's father essentially kidnaps him, taking him to a cabin in the middle of nowhere and getting drunk and beating his son.

Huck escapes by faking his own death and it's awesome and begins traveling up the Mississippi river. He runs into Jim, a slave who belonged to the Widow Douglas's sister. Jim overheard his owner talking about selling him, so he decided to run away and try to go north. Huck, after some hesitation, goes with him. From this point, the structure of the book closely mirrors Don Quixote : a mismatched pair of companions travels the country, having unrelated adventures and comic intervals. On their travels, Huck and Jim encounter con men, criminals, slave traders, and in the best mini-story in the book a family involved in a Hatfields-and-McCoys-like feud with a neighboring clan. The story comes full circle when Tom Sawyer shows up and joins Jim and Huck for the last of their adventures, and the best part of this is that Tom Sawyer's overall ridiculousness becomes obvious once we see him through Huck's eyes.

Huck is a great narrator, and I think one of the reasons I liked this book more than its counterpart was because it's narrated in first person, and so Huck's voice is able to come through clearly in every word. Damn, Mark Twain. A fun, deceptively light series of stories that's funny and sad when you least expect it. Well done, The List - you picked a good one, for once. The review's over. Oh, I get it. You want me to talk about the racism, right? You want me to discuss how Huck views Jim as stolen property instead of a person and criticize the frequent use of the N-Word and say "problematic" a lot, right? Well, tough titties. I'm not getting involved in that, because it's stupid and pointless, and I'm just going to let Mark Twain's introduction to The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn speak for itself, and the work as a whole: "Persons attempting to find a motive in this narrative will be prosecuted; persons attempting to find a moral in it will be banished; persons attempting to find a plot in it will be shot.

View all 23 comments. We catched fish, and talked, and we took a swim now and then to keep off sleepiness. We had mighty good weather, as a general thing, and nothing ever happened to us at all, that night, nor the next, nor the next. I grow to love it more with each repeated reading. Fans of its predecessor were surprised to find that Huck Finn was not the romantic depiction of southern boyhood that Tom Sawyer was. Instead, the novel was a realistic look at the hypocrisy and senselessness of southern society. Huck Finn tells the story of a young boy searching for freedom and identity in this backwards society. In his own story, Huck takes over as narrator with his distinctive voice, sharing with the reader not only his escapades since fleeing his abusive father, but also his growing philosophy about slavery and the changing country around him.

A complicated character, Jim goes from silly to tragic, sometimes even within the same paragraph. Those around Huck are upset by it too, and their inaction speaks volumes. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn has been one of the most banned books in America. From complaints about its use of foul language and stereotypes, to being a bad influence on children, this book has never escaped controversy. While re-reading it again this go around, I wondered who exactly did Twain picture as his audience. Yes, Huck dresses up like a girl and gets in comic misadventures, but this is more a novel about slavery, beatings, child abuse, alcoholism and murder.

Twain begins by hitting all of the stereotypes Americans of that period would have expected, then he builds on the character until he emerges as a hero, sacrificing his freedom to carry an injured white boy to safety. It is a subtle and brilliant statement against racism and for equality. Lastly, Huckleberry Finn is a book about transitions. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn is filled with all sorts of transitions for Huck.

Throughout the entire novel, Huck is in a state of Limbo. Huck transitions from a boy being civilized in St. Petersburg, Missouri, to a young man completely disenchanted with society. Finally, he transitions from being indoctrinated by southern morality to accepting his own individual morals and heading off to free Jim. Huck is constantly changing over the course of the novel. He starts out as the immature Missouri boy playing jokes on slaves, but by the end he is an enlightened young man ready to head west to a better tomorrow. Huckleberry Finn is the future of America. View all 10 comments. Rebecca Bringing back memories from when I was little. Kenny Rebecca wrote: "Bringing back memories from when I was little.

Oct 02, Blaine rated it really liked it Shelves: pop-chart-lab , , mass-market-paperback. Jim said that bees won't sting idiots, but I didn't believe that, because I tried them lots of times myself and they wouldn't sting me. Human beings can be awful cruel to one another. This book opens in the aftermath of The Adventures of Tom Sawyer , and for a time, it has the same joyous feel as the boys continue their antics of rebellious year-olds. After being kidnapped and beaten, Huck escapes his father by faking his own death and then going on the run. He soon crosses paths with a runaway slave, Jim, and together they raft their way down the Mississippi.

Once again, the book is largely a series of vignettes with a very loose overarching plot. Huck and Jim travel from Missouri through Kentucky and Arkansas and into the antebellum South, getting into scrapes and making escapes along the way. So why was I reading this classic novel during Banned Books Week? For that, we have to talk about race and racism. The characters here and the author, for that matter are products of their 19th century time. The n-word is used relentlessly in this book, even by the slaves themselves, and it is jarring. But I come down on the side of those who read this book as transcending and challenging the racist stereotypes of the time. Huck has been taught by society all his life to view blacks as slaves, as less than.

And at a pivotal moment, he writes a letter to report where Jim can be found by his master, and at first he thinks the letter is the right thing to do: I felt good and all washed clean of sin for the first time I had ever felt so in my life, and I knowed I could pray now. And went on thinking. And got to thinking over our trip down the river; and I see Jim before me all the time: in the day and in the night-time, sometimes moonlight, sometimes storms, and we a-floating along, talking and singing and laughing. Huck says the wrong thing, and uses racist language, again and again throughout this book. That might be the best we can realistically expect from a book published in the s. Is this The Great American Novel? It was one of the first books to truly capture the course, plain spoken language of its time.

So yeah, it just might be, even though I prefer To Kill a Mockingbird. Highly recommended. Mar 03, Fabian rated it really liked it. Huck Finn is the full embodiment of THE American Fantasy: mainly that dire misconception that the protagonist of the world is you and that everything gravitates around that essential nucleus. Everyone in town thinks Huck dead, and what does he do but follow the tradition of a plot folding unto itself as Don Q finds his story become medieval pop culture in Part II of that superior novel as he disguises himself as a little girl and tries to squeeze information out of some lady about his myth-in-the-making trek.

It seems everyone cares for this vagrant, a perpetual Sancho P to Tom Sawyer's Quixote, whose redeemable features include a pre-transcendental openmindedness and an inclination to live only in the NOW. But the narrator, a very unreliable one at that, surrounds himself with bad bad men, playing the role of accomplice often, always safe and sound under the dragon's wing. So: disguise used as an integral plot device several times throughout; brawny men taking a boy hostage; nakedness by the riverbed; costume changes, improvised Shakespearean shows, men almost always described as "beautiful" and women solely as "lovely" The humor is obvious, but I have to admit that this picaresque novel about a boy who avoids "sivilization" at all costs is beaten mercilessly by a more modern, therefore more RELEVANT tale of the South, "Confederacy of Dunces.

Mar 06, MCOH rated it liked it. I had mixed feelings about this book. On the one hand, it's clear that Mark Twain was progressive for his day, satirizing the topsy-turvy morals of the slavery-era south. His heroes are two people at the bottom rung of the social ladder - a runaway slave, and the son of the town drunk. Though they're not valued by society, they turn out to be the two most honorable characters of the book. And I appreciated the questions it raised, about how we construct our own sense of morality in the context of I had mixed feelings about this book. And I appreciated the questions it raised, about how we construct our own sense of morality in the context of broader social morals, and how we deal with potential conflicts between those two.

I loved Huck for choosing to go to hell rather than turn in his friend. On the other hand, it's such a far-fetched farce, with so many over-the-top scenes, one crazy situation after another, so many coincidences, such silliness, that I had a hard time enjoying it. At the end, Tom keeps adding all kinds of superfluous details into the escape plan, just to satisfy his sense of drama. The author seems to think this will be amusing - see how it's a funny game to Tom, see how he's influenced by all the adventure books he's ever read And I just wanted to smack the kid, and say, "A man's life is in danger! How dare you treat this like a game of make-believe!

Just get him out of there, you idiot! That style social satire, ironic farce, fable, whatever you want to call it can be a great way to make a point. But it's not the same as a novel with well-developed characters and a realistic plot. Sometimes I enjoy satire, but yesterday, I just wasn't in the mood. I felt like the atrocities committed in our country against African-Americans were just too horrific to laugh at. I have heard that people often protest this book when it appears on school curricula, because of the repeated use of the n-word. I think I had an easier time accepting that word, because it reflected the common usage of the time, and it felt like part of the natural, authentic voice of the narrator. I had a harder time with the portrayal of Jim as a naive, superstitious, gullible, person, who seems completely dependent on a young white boy to figure out what to do.

He's more an archetype - the noble savage - than a real person. I think the main value of this book is as a historical artifact. You can see the important role it played if you look at what it was for the time it was written in, and how it influenced other books written in America. I'm glad to say, we've come a long way. View all 21 comments. Nov 21, Manny rated it it was amazing Shelves: strongly-recommended , well-i-think-its-funny , blame-jordan-if-you-like. One of my absolute favourite books, which I have read multiple times. A major classic. If at all possible, get an edition with the original illustrations.

In fact, I'm embarrassed to admit that I hadn't even heard of it until Jordan gave me a few pointers earlier today. So, no doubt all this has been sa One of my absolute favourite books, which I have read multiple times. So, no doubt all this has been said before, but I still can't resist the temptation to add my two centimes worth. In case you're as ignorant as I was about hot topics in the literary world, the furore concerns an edition of Huckleberry Finn in which the word 'nigger' has been systematically replaced with 'slave'. My initial response was plain surprise. One of the aspects of the book I enjoy most is Twain's appallingly exact ear for dialogue.

He's reproducing the language actually used in the American South of the s, and this, above all, is what gives the novel its force; so why on earth would anyone want to change it? For example, here's Huck's Paw in full flow: "Oh, yes, this is a wonderful govment, wonderful. Why, looky here. There was a free nigger there from Ohio -- a mulatter, most as white as a white man. He had the whitest shirt on you ever see, too, and the shiniest hat; and there ain't a man in that town that's got as fine clothes as what he had; and he had a gold watch and chain, and a silver-headed cane -- the awfulest old gray-headed nabob in the State.

And what do you think? They said he was a p'fessor in a college, and could talk all kinds of languages, and knowed everything. And that ain't the wust. They said he could vote when he was at home. Well, that let me out. Thinks I, what is the country a-coming to? It was 'lection day, and I was just about to go and vote myself if I warn't too drunk to get there; but when they told me there was a State in this country where they'd let that nigger vote, I drawed out.

I says I'll never vote agin. Them's the very words I said; they all heard me; and the country may rot for all me -- I'll never vote agin as long as I live. And to see the cool way of that nigger -- why, he wouldn't a give me the road if I hadn't shoved him out o' the way. I says to the people, why ain't this nigger put up at auction and sold? And what do you reckon they said? Why, they said he couldn't be sold till he'd been in the State six months, and he hadn't been there that long yet. There, now -- that's a specimen. They call that a govment that can't sell a free nigger till he's been in the State six months.

Here's a govment that calls itself a govment, and lets on to be a govment, and thinks it is a govment, and yet's got to set stock-still for six whole months before it can take a hold of a prowling, thieving, infernal, white-shirted free nigger. I'm sorry, but I'm honestly unable to see how anyone could think the above passage was racist or might be improved by substituting 'slave' for 'nigger'.

It's incidents like this which create the popular European myth that Americans don't understand the concept of irony. If you're curious to know more about the tradition of improving great works of literature by removing dubious words, you might want to take a quick look at the Wikipedia article on Thomas Bowdler which Jordan and I were giggling over. Bowdler, it turns out, had acted from the best of motives. When he was young, his father had entertained him by reading aloud from Shakespeare; but Later, Bowdler realised his father had been extemporaneously omitting or altering passages he felt unsuitable for the ears of his wife and children.

Bowdler felt it would be worthwhile to present an edition which might be used in a family whose father was not a sufficiently "circumspect and judicious reader" to accomplish this expurgation himself. He undertook to create a suitably amended version. Or, to be exact, he got his sister to do it and then gave out the books under his own name. Again, his reasons were unimpeachable: it would have reflected badly on her to admit that she had understood the naughtier passages. I won't criticise Dr Bowdler or his equally well-meaning modern followers. I just think it's a shame Mark Twain never had the opportunity to write a story about them.

Pretty good, kinda silly - but I think that is what Twain was going for - 3. Twain is the king of the Yarn. Huckleberry Finn is a collection of outlandish tales all with lies and trickery at their heart. At the time of its release I am sure it became a bible for scoundrels and mischevious teens. This book is controversial, and even frequently banned, because of its portrayal of black slaves and the use of the N-word.

I venture into shaky ground here by offering my opinion as I am white, bu Pretty good, kinda silly - but I think that is what Twain was going for - 3. I venture into shaky ground here by offering my opinion as I am white, but I don't think I will cause too much trouble. I can accept that at the time of writing the words and language were fairly normal so as a time period piece it is true. However, I can't say I have read a book that takes place in that time period that so flippantly tosses the n-word around. Regarding banning of this book - I can definitely tell why some parents might be concerned about their kids reading this book.

I think a lot of it depends on how it is being taught - I would hope the teacher would put an emphasis on explaining the language being used. Summary: - A good book - Kind of silly - A handbook for deception - An understandably controversial reflection of the prejudices at the time it was written - Some may need guidance regarding the the way racial differences are portrayed in this book. View all 12 comments. If you're into stuff like this, you can read the full review. View all 6 comments. Mar 30, Bradley rated it it was amazing Shelves: shelf , traditional-fiction.

The point is, you can understand it and it's often, well Or compelling. Or understandable. Or sad. It is after all based on a very real human condition, not just a satirical critique of the worst of human traits. And about murdering people. You like that? I know it's not standard, but a protagonist CAN be a villain. If you think experiencing or creating something makes you an advocate of it, you're missing out on a lot of good art. Anyways, the entire book is written from Patrick Bateman's point of view, and Patrick Bateman is a materialistic vain insecure obsessive compulsive hallucinating yeah, mysogynistic delusional psychopath.

And you will be completely enveloped in his world. This is what traps you and makes the book so addicting. I would read this book at the park, or on the bus, and when I'd put it down to join the rest of the human world it was almost impossible. For a good 10 minutes I'd just be staring at people feeling a million miles away. Learn from this, but don't identify with it; this itself is a type of compassion to feel what a lot of people in this country are stuck in. You don't skip over the bits about his facial creams, you absorb it and afterwards let your jaw drop that he is more passionate about it than any human life, or feeling.

People ARE materials to him, just more useless and often tasteless ones. Maybe you won't even notice when a talking cheerio is sitting in a chair being interviewed, since you can't be sure of what he's hallucinating either. View all 10 comments. Aug 29, GTF rated it it was amazing. Where to begin? Well firstly, I will just comment on the violence in this novel and say that it contains some of the most graphic torture and killings that I have ever read about both in the real and fictional world.

There are wild and creative forms of brutality performed on people that I didn't know were possible. I am not easily put off by goriness, but a lot of pages of this book were difficult to read. It goes without saying that 'American Psycho' is not for the faint-hearted. The story is t Where to begin? The story is told from the perspective of a wealthy investment banker named Patrick Bateman who lives on one of the most prestigious streets in New York City. The beginning of the novel suggests nothing too horrific about Bateman, but he does often mutter very questionable remarks about himself under his breath, begins seething over trivial matters, and is remarkably meticulous with assessing expensive clothes and jewelry.

To the reader, he is initially just another self-absorbed upper-class asshole who lives a very extravagant, promiscuous and drug-fueled lifestyle. However, the dark and cruel side of Bateman's character eventually manifests and his acts of murder and sadism become a frequent hobby. It also becomes increasingly clearer that his sanity is very dubious, as he develops trouble with distinguishing the real from the imagined. His decaying sanity along with his astounding callousness creates a highly unreliable narrator.

In a way this book reminded me of 'The Catcher in The Rye' with the addition of appalling violence and insanity as it is not centred around a plot but instead just features endless and intriguing pondering of the male narrator. Easton Ellis is very skilled at creating characters. He can divide people into various categories of habits, intellect, temperament, level of empathy etc. View all 8 comments. I read about it years ago and avoided it because of all the stories or gore and misogyny associated with it.

Then, I heard friends discussing it less critically. So, when the library opened after the holiday break, I took it home That threw me off as an evil portent. Not that I am queezy about harsh language, just that that word for me conjures the same negativity and images of slavery sexual in this case that it seriously put me off. I am reading the gory strange Bunny by Mona Awad as penance. View all 51 comments. As far as I can tell, there are two ways to interpret this book. The first is as a hysterically funny, incredibly dark satire on the excess, greed and materialism of rich young Americans in the late s. The second is as a hideously misogynist extended fantasy about the abuse, torture and murder of women. It's the second interpretation that raises issues for me.

I am a feminist, and proud to say so; yet I absolutely loved this book. So is it possible to be a feminist and still enjoy American P As far as I can tell, there are two ways to interpret this book. So is it possible to be a feminist and still enjoy American Psycho? My personal, subjective answer to this question is yes. I can understand the objections others have raised and, unsurprisingly, I found the violent scenes intensely disturbing and difficult to read, and skimmed over the worst parts in the same way I'd squint at the screen during a particularly bloody film scene.

The titular psycho, protagonist and narrator, Patrick Bateman, is undoubtedly a horrifically misogynist character - both in terms of the hideous things he does to women and in the minute details of the ways in which he perceives and judges them. The female characters pretty much all of them, one by one are objectified in the ultimate way - desired, fucked, tortured, dissected, even eaten. The violence is often juxtaposed closely with graphically detailed sex scenes or fantasies, with the two flowing into one another until they begin to seem almost inseperable.

To me, this feels like a damning comment on the links between pornography, the consumer of pornography's view of women, and violent behaviour. And after all I've read about the author's motivations in writing the novel and other readers' and critics' reactions to it, I'm fairly sure this is how it's meant to be read. The story is so obviously an allegory that, to be honest, I find it hard to understand how anyone could take it seriously as a fantasy of violence.

Bateman announces his crimes to colleagues and girlfriends at numerous points, with these confessions become more blatant and more desperate as the book goes on - yet it seems nobody ever hears him, or their own self-absorption and greed is advanced to such a level that they don't notice or care. The character becomes more and more of a blank canvas as the book goes on, a development underlined by the fact that he is constantly being mistaken for someone else, or spotting an acquaintance and not being sure exactly who it is. The men melt into a homogenous blur of Brooks Brothers suits, Valentino ties, slicked-back hair and nonprescription glasses; the women into an interchangeable mass of blonde hair, big tits, whiny voices and Carolina Herrera silk blouses.

In the end it doesn't seem that Bateman is actually a character as much as an amalgam of these people: their obscene greed, materialism, lack of empathy and empty selfishness - mixed in with astounding naivety and ignorance - concentrated and personified. As the narrative becomes ever more surreal and descends into madness towards the book's conclusion, the latter theory begins to seem more and more likely. Bateman's supposed victims seem to reappear; he is involved in an impossibly lengthy police shoot-out which yields no retribution; he begins to step outside himself, narrating from a third-person perspective. The only incident in which he is identified as a killer by someone else appears, at second glance, to be a straightforward robbery.

At the very end of the story, the reader is left to make up their own mind about the truth of events, making this a classic example of the unreliable narrator genre I really should create an unreliable-narrators shelf here, I love them so much. This book is, as its reputation suggests, a harrowing read at times, but it's also truly hilarious in parts - the endless repetition, the lengthy passages solemnly appraising the back catalogues of dreadful 80s bands, the meticulous descriptions of ludicrous meals and label-laden outfits.

I loathe gratuitous violence and 'torture porn' films but while the violent scenes in this book are arguably unnecessary in their detail, they are contained within the context of a viciously intelligent satire. I wavered between admiration, amusement and repulsion throughout many of the earlier chapters, but I really loved the ending; the build-up and the subtle changes and the conclusion itself, all so brilliantly done. Altogether I thought this was an absolutely fantastic, if not always 'enjoyable', book and I don't feel bad about saying so. Do not read this book.

Are you easily frightened? Do not read this review. Are you easily annoyed? Do not read about this asshole. Are you easily sickened? Do not read horrific tale. Are you easily dizzied? Do not read anything. The only reason I decided to read the damn book is because I noticed it was 1 on numerous Goodreads list. When I first started reading, I was completely baffled as all the story entailed was Patricks self centered life, filled with his self absorbed unlikeable friends doing absolutely nothing worthwhile.

What the hell is so impressive about that?? I imagined Christian Bale as Pat Bateman, which definitely helped make a day in the life of Pat enjoyable Here's a glimpse Yup that's a rundown of the first half of the book Can you see why I was confused?.. I kept reading and slowly but surely Patrick starting dropping little clues. Here's a few Sadly animals were harmed in the story. I felt I should warn you.. So, am I still wondering why this is This is not for the faint of heart.

You must be ready for anything and everything to be written Okay, I'm getting queasy just thinking about it For more reviews, Free E-books and Giveaways View all 86 comments. Feb 16, Jonathan Janz rated it it was amazing. I've been putting off writing a review of this novel because I have so many conflicting emotions about it. So I'll just streamline it by throwing my reactions at you haphazardly. You know, kind of like Patrick Bateman's disordered thoughts. This book is vicious, vile, and often made me suppress a whimper. It's the only book that's ever sickened me to that degree. Bret Easton Ellis, like him or not, is a masterful writer, and this is a masterful book. I've never in my life felt so guilty I've been putting off writing a review of this novel because I have so many conflicting emotions about it.

I've never in my life felt so guilty for laughing at a book, but laugh I did. A lot. Have I mentioned how horrible the events detailed in this novel are? Imagine the worst thing possible. Then multiply it times seven. Then realize that what Patrick Bateman has in store makes what you imagined look like a PG horror movie. The kind where things jump out at you, there's no nudity, and there are never, ever bloody deaths. Patrick Bateman is one of the most unique characters in all of fiction. I truly despise him. I also find his interpersonal interactions and reactions so hilarious that I was constantly entertained by him.

At least, until he got women back to his apartment. About that. I can't emphasize enough how monstrous Bateman's behavior is. Several times I found myself writhing in bed in the desperate hope that a scene would Please. So why is this a five-star review? Because the book knows exactly what it is. This novel is utterly unique and totally unapologetic. So while I condemn the behavior in the book, I celebrate the artistry with which it's rendered. If you read it, I guarantee you'll feel a little worse about mankind afterward. View all 26 comments. Aug 08, Krok Zero rated it really liked it Shelves: summer I would write a review, but I have to go return some videotapes.

At this point I'm sure it bores everyone to dredge up the whole misogyny question again, but it still puzzles me that smart people who must certainly know not to confuse the character's perspective with the author's continue to pull the concern-troll card here. Like, it's perfectly I would write a review, but I have to go return some videotapes. Like, it's perfectly valid if you think the satire in the book fails, or even if you think the violence is overwrought, but anyone who thinks this book is misogynistic must also believe that Mark Twain was racist for using the word "nigger" repeatedly in Huck Finn. You can't and won't convince me that there's any meaningful difference.

Of course, what's unfortunate about the "does this book hate women" discourse is that it blocks discussion of the hundreds of pages of this book that do not contain violence towards women or men. One thing that surprised me going in, as I did, with various preconceptions was that Patrick Bateman is not really the cartoon character that Christian Bale portrayed in the movie. I mean, my memory of the film is dim, and I know that Bale was great in it, but on the page Bateman is a lot scarier because he's self-aware. You can't just dismiss him as an easily mockable artificial construct or a satirical avatar of Ellis's anti-yuppie vitriol, because you're living inside his head for pages, and it's clear that he knows exactly what he is -- and, more disturbingly, he seems to be the only character in the book for whom this is true.

I think that's the elephant in the room that people who talk about American Psycho either don't understand or don't wanna face: Bateman, as monstrous as he is, is actually the hero of this story. He's the only one who speaks directly and listens to people, while everyone else is off in their own solipsistic haze; he's the only one who seems to have any interests beyond the rank materialism of snazzy clothes and trendy restaurants, it's just that those interests involve sadistic torture and murder; he's the only one with any apparent concerns about the world and his place in it.

Given the utter voidlike vapidity of every single person in this novel, it's not unreasonable to say that Bateman is the only one with a soul. That is the truly frightening thing about this book, moreso than any of the torture-porn scenes. Psycho can be repetitive and, I think, inconsistent -- is the eloquent, charming Bateman of the first chapter's dinner party really the same guy as the Bateman who can't complete any basic social interaction without begging off to go return some videotapes? Maybe it's just his descent into total madness, but something about the evolution of the character felt improvisatory on Ellis's part. The other thing that's mostly missing here, which is why I think it's ultimately inferior to Less Than Zero , is the subtly calibrated pathos that made the earlier novel such a knockout.

Without resorting to speeches or explanations, Ellis expressed in Less Than Zero a deep sadness that belied the narrator's affectless tone. In American Psycho , there was really only one moment that felt like the kind of grace note I loved in the earlier book, and I'll paste it here: We had to leave the Hamptons because I would find myself standing over our bed in the hours before dawn, with an ice pick gripped in my fist, waiting for Evelyn to open her eyes. That's the most beautiful sentence in either book, maybe the only truly beautiful sentence Ellis has ever written -- his strengths as a writer do not really include handsome prose. It's such a chilling image -- not a visceral horror like the infamous rat scene, but something that hits you right in the soul, something that, again, makes it impossible to domesticate Bateman by laughing at him.

I wish there was more like it. But in the absence of that, there is plenty to laugh at; I loved the book's comic centerpiece, an all-night conference call between Bateman and a few of his buddies as they spend hours trying to figure out where to eat dinner. It's the kind of marathon absurdism I love, like Mr. Show's Story of Everest bit, where you can't believe how long the joke is being dragged out, and eventually the dragging-out becomes the joke, to the point that you get irritated, but then the joke laps your irritation and you find it hilarious again.

Bateman's lone encounter with law enforcement actually a P. And it never stops being funny when Bateman will straight-up admit, in plain English, that he is a mass murderer, and his conversation partner will not register his confession at all -- because Ellis's most abundantly clear point is that people in this culture did not do not? So nah, I don't think this is a Great American Novel, or the Great Gatsby of the late 20th century as one Goodreads reviewer floated , although I do think that's what Ellis was going for, in his own sick way. But twenty years later it's still stirring up debate, and if that's not a mark of good litterachurr I dunno what is. View all 38 comments. Mar 25, Brad rated it it was amazing Shelves: to-read-again , faves , notorious.

When a book sticks with you, you know it is powerful. It may not be entertaining, and it may be downright disturbing, but if you can't get it out of your head it is most certainly great, and that is my experience with American Psycho. For me, it's about the music. Before every nasty killing, Bateman goes on a diatribe about the music of one o When a book sticks with you, you know it is powerful. Before every nasty killing, Bateman goes on a diatribe about the music of one of these eighties' faves, then listens to the music while killing, making it the soundtrack of habitrails and bloodshed.

I can't listen to any of these singers without visions of Patrick Bateman's killings flooding into my consciousness. Granted, losing some of these singers is worse than the loss of others, but it has been over a decade since I last read American Psycho and the gory music video Ellis conjured in my mind is as strong as ever. I can barely reference the images of the real videos of "I Want a New Drug" or "If This Is It," but I can see a voracious rat about to eat a woman to death through her reproductive organs with stunning and disgusting clarity. It is not a pretty book, and the squeamish should stay away, but for anyone who seeks to be overwhelmed by images they will never forget, American Psycho is one of the greatest books ever written.

Patrick Bateman is the quintessential eighties American male; he may even be America itself. Obsessed with appearance and appearances, consumption and greed almost clinically so , Bateman is arrogant to the point of hubris, malicious, deviant, and ultra violent, yet he still maintains an outward likability that completely fools his friends allies much like the nation he so perfectly represents from his first person narrative -- "me, me, me" -- right down to his designer suits and morning, skin revival rituals , and therein lies one of the necessities of violence in Ellis' narrative. If Bateman is America, Ellis needs to lay the nation's murderous streak bare; he needs to make people face the brutality and horror of the murderous act -- not simply gloss over it and move on as post-Vietnam America wittingly did and continues to do.

Even today, people blithely ignore the violence inherent in the American system, and if American Psycho is an allegory for this system, the terrible violence of Bateman's cruelest moments become the most important moments of the book. They force us to face the cruelty, to see the cruelty and not forget it. And if Ellis were to drop the violence but maintain the rest of the book as a criticism of consumerism, the removal of the violence would simply become another version what Reagan's America did so well and the nation has been doing so well ever since -- admitting the less offensive problems to hide the more offensive.

Even if we drop the allegory, however, and simply see Bateman as a monster whose presence criticizes hyper-misogyny, hyper-violence, hyper-masculinity, and hyper-consumption, Ellis' choice to express the violence as he did is sound because when Patrick Bateman isn't being violent and he isn't being literally violent very often his narrative has the ability to lull us into comfort -- to forget how horrible the man can be, how horrible he really is. Thus, the book's moments of shocking violence wake us out of our comfort zone and force us to face the sort of monster our culture created and still creates there are more serial killers killing today, after all, than ever before.

When Ellis was writing this piece, I doubt that he was considering the infamy his book was about to achieve. So when I read American Psycho I try to suspend what I already know about the contents of the book and the controversy surrounding the book and imagine which is the best I can do what it would have been like for a reader who had no idea what they were getting into -- which was surely Ellis' intent even if this could only happen a few times in the book's history : for the uninitiated, Bateman would seem a little weird to begin with, maybe mildly OCD, but likable all the same. Bateman's cynicism and his dislike of the insufferable people that surround him would likely win over most readers very quickly; we would connect with his unhappiness and quickly come to empathize with a man who's struggling to find out what is wrong with his life, even though he has a dream job, everything he'll ever need, and a potentially dream life.

He is a murderer. And not just a murderer but the worst kind of sadistic serial killer one can imagine. It challenges us to wonder if anyone can be part of this culture and truly claim innocence. What an amazing reading experience it is must have been for the people who read the book without any foreknowledge. And what a tremendous feat of writing on Ellis' part. If you try to read American Psycho today, I hope you approach it from this direction because I think all of Ellis' possible purposes come clearer when we enter American Psycho as a blank slate -- even if it can only be an imaginary one.

View all 27 comments. Aug 20, Tara rated it really liked it. I was simply imitating reality, a rough resemblance of a human being, with only a dim corner of my mind functioning. It goes over-the-top in almost every way possible. It does so in an attempt to function as a mind-numbingly excessive illustration of how excess numbs the mind. Yeah, I know, that sounds like a cutesy, gimmicky, too-clever setup for a novel, right?

But, to my mind, Ellis makes it work. Mine, at least, are nonprescription. View all 16 comments. Wow, okay. American Psycho wasn't what I expected. I honestly thought I would love this, however, I would have settled for at least mildly enjoying it. Even the most tepid of enjoyment would have been preferred to the actual experience I had. I know quite a few people who would include this one on their favorites list, but after my experience with it, I don't see why? I did not enjoy this at all. I was so gut-wrenchingly bored for almost the entire book, I couldn't wait for it to be over! Let m Wow, okay. Let me be clear, it wasn't the content. I read a lot of brutal, gory stuff; frankly, I thought it could have used some more of that.

Although any scene involving a dog? It was just brain-drainingly repetitive. I get it. Moving on. Happy to have checked this one off of my TBR, now I know. Thank you so much to my dear friend, Shannon for gifting me an audiobook copy of this. I never would have made it through otherwise! I could eventually have some more thoughts on this, but for right now, I'm over it. View all 25 comments. Aug 13, TK rated it it was amazing Shelves: literary. The scariest thing about this book for me is that since I finished reading it--almost eight years ago--I still look around when I am in a crowded place at the faces of the people and wonder: Which one of you thinks like Patrick Bateman?

Which one of you is ready to snap? Perhaps these other faces think the same when they look at me View all 7 comments. Jul 08, Jen rated it really liked it. I remember clearly having wrestled with the prelude to this paroxysm. Trying to syphon off the black humor welling up by thinking about Dr. It first touched the stillness of the room with a wheeze, doing little to upset the barometric-billiards in the surrounding space. Then there was a hoarse bark, a snap of the cue, its ballistics sufficient to disrupt the racked horror of my fellow students and send their attention scattering off surfaces and spiraling into the nimbus of my peculiar sensibilities.

Soon I was expelling sonic hordes. Crashing over objects, ricocheting off walls, tear-assing through circuitous canals to savage eardrums, trample ossicles, and kick cochlea for good measure. The teacher, a mask of incredulic-horrificationing, soon intervened on behalf of those poor souls caught in the vortex, demanding that I stop. And so I was sent to the office to atone for acts of heinous hilarity. Then you could well accuse me of being nuttier than squirrel turds and unworthy of serious consideration.

It clearly requires a certain combination of characteristics which are perhaps quite rare in the proper ratio. Note that this sample is utterly anemic compared to the highly detailed gore which explodes across many pages like a bloated whale corpse packed with dynamite, compact discs, and yuppie intestines. I think it goes without saying that if you have a weak constitution you sh- I have to return some video tapes. View all 20 comments. Sep 26, Ahmad Sharabiani rated it really liked it Shelves: fiction , horror , mystery , classics , crime-mystery , literature , novels , united-states , 20th-century. The story is told in the first person by Patrick Bateman, a serial killer and Manhattan businessman.

Set in Manhattan during the Wall Street boom of the late 's, American Psycho follows the life of wealthy young investment banker Patrick Bateman. Bateman, in his mid's when the story begins, narrates his everyday activities, from his recreational life among the Wall Street elite of New York to his forays into murder by night. Through present tense stream-of-consciousness narrative, Bateman describes his daily life, ranging from a series of Friday nights spent at nightclubs with his colleagues—where they snort cocaine, critique fellow club-goers' clothing, trade fashion advice, and question one another on proper etiquette—to his loveless engagement to fellow yuppie Evelyn and his contentious relationship with his brother and senile mother.

Bateman's stream of consciousness is occasionally broken up by chapters in which he directly addresses the reader in order to critique the work of 's pop music artists. The novel maintains a high level of ambiguity through mistaken identity and contradictions that introduce the possibility that Bateman is an unreliable narrator. Characters are consistently introduced as people other than themselves, and people argue over the identities of others they can see in restaurants or at parties. Deeply concerned with his personal appearance, Bateman gives extensive descriptions of his daily aesthetics regimen. After killing Paul Owen, one of his colleagues, Bateman appropriates his apartment as a place to host and kill more victims.

Oct 15, Stacia the club rated it did not like it Recommends it for: Someone who can handle tons of gore. Recommended to Stacia the club by: Ash Wednesday. Shelves: male-pov , adult , realistic-general-or-lit-fiction , dark-or-taboo , horror , i-blame-ash. See Pat date. See Pat screw. See Pat mace. See Pat use a nail gun. See Pat eat flesh. See Pat do obscene things with a severed head. See Pat store body parts in random places. Go, Pat, go! That's the tame version. I didn't spoil the extreme parts of the story.

Trust me. It might be a long, long time before I read something which knocks American Psycho out of the top spot for "sickest thing I've ever witnessed," and I've read books which have had rape, murder, and gore See Pat date. It might be a long, long time before I read something which knocks American Psycho out of the top spot for "sickest thing I've ever witnessed," and I've read books which have had rape, murder, and gore aplenty in them.

How often can a person say that the movie was better than the book? I actually liked the movie because it carried the point from the story without being quite as tedious or gruesome. Part of me wanted to spoiler-tag a couple of the more gruesome scenes, just to give readers who were curious something to look at. But I'm not giving anyone any ideas. Pages and pages of excessive description gave no great sense of entertainment or enjoyment in terms of reading experience. I do understand why the author did what he needed to do in order to set up the character's state of mind to the reader. Many of the conversations and interactions were needed, and a few were actually informative or interesting, but the same point really could have been made in a few chapters.

It all comes down to reading preference for me. Half a book of recycled conversation about fashion, society, tanning, etc. I hate wasting my time by reading about stuff I don't want to read about, satire or not. Overkill is still overkill, especially when you see the same catch-phrases hardbody, gazelleskin, etc. By the time I got to the chapter on detailing Whitney Houston's career, I was downright tired of reading scene after scene of tedious information. Speaking of excessive Try thinking of the sickest way you could kill someone. Chances are, you aren't even close to thinking about what Pat put his victims through. Did Pat become the way that he was because he was so rich and bored, and had nothing left to achieve or desire, or was his mind so completely ordered and methodical about everything from the start, that he viewed murder without emotion as just another thing he could organize and categorize?

I get why American Psycho has a good portion of its ratings on either one end or the other of the spectrum. Since the subject itself doesn't lend itself well to words such as "love" or "admire," a reader is either going to respect the method of writing, or hate the product of the writing. I wanted to fall on the respect end because I understood why others rated the book high. But I can't overcome the fact that I hated reading the repetitive formula of : character talks about meaningless shit, character talks about or participates in unappealing and super-extreme sex, then character makes a gruesome kill. The end of the story gave the reader nothing to wrap up the madness of it all. The guy was a psycho. That's about it. At least the book was aptly named.

I wrote a book that is all surface action: no narrative, no characters to latch onto, flat, endlessly repetitive. I get the message he wanted to sent out, and I'm definitely able to respect and appreciate that. However, I personally appreciate well-developed characters and a good plot even more, so this book just wasn't for me. At the end, I felt like nothing had happened, even though so much had happened?? I don't know how to describe it I guess that's the point of the novel: For everything to just be on the surface, for nothing to make an impact.

So again, the purpose of the author was definitely fulfilled; it just wasn't the kind of book I enjoy reading. View all 6 comments. Nov 04, Warwick rated it did not like it Shelves: fiction , dont-own , united-states. I am not convinced that endless descriptions of murder and torture are a good metaphor for unrestrained eighties capitalism. Consequently, while I have read many books that made me uncomfortable or nauseous, I have not read any that did so for such weak returns. The prose style is never better than competent. Generally it alternates between repellant and just very dull. I don't think it's hard to make readers feel sick and disgusted. If I tell you I have a puppy in one hand, and a blunt pencil in I am not convinced that endless descriptions of murder and torture are a good metaphor for unrestrained eighties capitalism.

If I tell you I have a puppy in one hand, and a blunt pencil in the other, even though you know they don't really exist you probably don't want me to decribe what happens when the two are made to interact. Exercises in this sort of writing have to work hard not to feel juvenile and this one doesn't work at all. There is a lively ongoing debate over whether it's misogynistic or not, just have a look at the comments to Paul Bryant's excellent review. To me it seems self-evident that the book is misogynistic — but then there are a lot of excellent novels that are also misogynistic, so I'm not sure how far that gets you.

More pertinent for me was just the fact that I loathed every moment I spent reading it. I think I threw it away halfway through. Maybe it turns into Tolstoy after page , but I have no inclination whatever to find out. View all 9 comments. Feb 18, mark monday rated it did not like it Shelves: murdertime , all-fucked-up. Criminal had arty direction by an interesting director that i like, Mark Romanek. American Psycho is also interesting: intelligent and stylishly written, with some "points" to make about consumer culture, class, and male egotism. View all 13 comments. Damn this book is graphic! It's the s and the rich keep on getting richer and the poor keep on getting poorer. Patrick Bateman is bored of his humdrum life on Wall Street.

Nothing seems to excite him more than stopping people and ripping them apart. We follow his quick descent into madness as Ellis gives us in a blow-by-blow fashion. With the exception of a few scenes, the movie is pretty much true to the book. They cut out a lot of the sex as well as the killing of a child and a dog. They als Damn this book is graphic! They also toned down the gore substantially. I can see why people hate this book. Patrick Bateman and his "friends" are a pack of egotistical and extremely self-centered pricks. I mean it's supposed to be American Psycho, not American Douchebag right? However sexist Bateman is not.

And I will tell you why Women are either trash or hard bodies or they are deemed as unfuckable and are completely in love with him. He even looks down on animals LOL. Bateman is a case where he in discriminately looks down upon everyone that is not him. As the somewhat rational person that I like to think I am, I have a hard time thinking that another human being could actually put pen to paper the way that this author did with some of these scenes.

It kind of makes you sick. That's how sickening it is. With all of that aside the book is rather a boring read. The Douchebag Circle is constantly talking about the hard bodies they want to fuck or the new things that they bought or who is sleeping with who or the drugs they can score and where. All of it is extremely monotonous and takes up more than half of the book in all. It gets rather annoying. With everything considered I would have to say this was an okay read. However I wouldn't really recommend this book because of the extremely graphic scenes and apparently obvious tendency to piss people off for one reason or another.

View 2 comments. Readers also enjoyed. About Bret Easton Ellis. Bret Easton Ellis. Bret Easton Ellis is an American author. He is considered to be one of the major Generation X authors and was regarded as one of the so-called literary Brat Pack, which also included Tama Janowitz and Jay McInerney. He has called himself a moralist, although he has often been pegged as a nihilist. His characters are generally young vacuous people, who are aware of their depravity but choose to enj Bret Easton Ellis is an American author. His characters are generally young vacuous people, who are aware of their depravity but choose to enjoy it.

The novels are also linked by common, recurring characters, and dystopic locales such as Los Angeles and New York. Books by Bret Easton Ellis. Articles featuring this book. We'll admit it: Of all the types of novelists, it's horror writers we have the most questions for. Like: WHY? Read more Trivia About American Psycho. Quotes from American Psycho. Welcome back. Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. Best Serial Killer fiction Book.

I What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn usually bother giving negative reviews What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn, but I feel it's time to nail my What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn Optimism Critical Thinking the mast and identify a full house-tv show problematic titles. The Pennsylvania Genealogical Magazine, Volume Consequently, while I have read many books that made me uncomfortable or nauseous, I have not read any that did so What Is The Theme Of Racism In Huck Finn such weak returns.

Current Viewers: